11/29/2022 0 Comments Vallum security services corporation![]() ![]() ![]() He found Vallum to be an independent contractor and, consequently, declined to hold Hyatt Baguio liable for dismissal of private respondents. On, the Labor Arbiter rendered a decision dismissing the complaints. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library The several cases were consolidated together. VALLUM SECURITY SERVICES CORPORATION FULLThey prayed for reinstatement with full backwages. Instead, between July and September 1988, private respondents filed several complaints against petitioners in the National Labor Relations Commission's Office ("NLRC") in Baguio City for illegal dismissal and unfair labor practices for violation of labor standards relating to underpayment of wages, premium holiday and restday pay, uniform allowances and meal allowances. None of the private respondents reported at Sucat for re-assignment. They were also told that failure to report at Sucat would be taken to mean that they were no longer interested in being re-assigned to some other client of Vallum. Private respondents were directed to report to Vallum's head office at Sucat Road, in Muntinlupa, Metropolitan Manila, not later than 15 July 1988 for re-assignment. On 30 June 1988, private respondents, who were security guards provided by Vallum to Hyatt Baguio, were informed by Vallum's Personnel Officer that the contract between the two (2) had already expired. Maulbecker, on 22 June 1988, that it was agreeable to the termination of the contract. ![]() Inocentes, President of Vallum advising that effective 1 July 1988, the contract of security services would be terminated. Maulbecker, Hyatt Baguio's General Manager, wrote to Domingo A. On 1 September 1986, petitioner Baguio Leisure Corporation (Hyatt Terraces Baguio) ("Hyatt Baguio") and petitioner Vallum Security Services ("Vallum") entered into a contract for security services under the terms of which Vallum agreed to protect the properties and premises of Hyatt Baguio by providing fifty (50) security guards, on a 24-hour basis, a day. ROSEMARIE DUMLAO, FLORENTINO CASTAÑEDA, RUBEN PANTERIA, JOHNNY VILLANUEVA, DELIA ROSARIO, GARY JAVATE, DEAN PASAMIC, VALERIE BRIONES, NEMENCIO CUTCHON, PHILIP MORIS, VINCENT NOEL CABRERA and JAIME GIMENO, Respondents. NESTOR LABADOR, ROMEO LOPEZ, MANOLO MAGAT, MARIANO MARCENA, WILSON MUNAR. ![]() THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, RUBEN ABELLERA, MANUEL GANANCIAL, SAMSON ALEJERA, ROMEO BAUTISTA, CARLOS BANIAGO, GABRIEL CABASAL, ARTEMIO CARIÑO, BENJAMIN LARON, SANTIAGO PACULAN, FRANCISCO OBEDOZA, CEFERINO GARCIA, ARNOLD PAMINLAN, ROMAN PALIMA, JOSEFINO LOZANO, PEDRO DULAY, JR., CLAUDIO PANGANIBAN, RONNIE BALDERAS, AVELINO PINTO, BEN ENRIQUE ESTOCAPIO, ESABELITO ANGARA, ROBERT AGUIMBAG, WILSON ESTAVILLO, FELIXBERTO NARVASA, PABLITO ROSARIO, EDGAR PALISOC, DONIE PERALTA, WILLY QUESADA, MARIO URBANO, EDWIN JACOB, JOSE VIRGILIO LUSTERIO, MA. VALLUM SECURITY SERVICES and BAGUIO LEISURE CORPORATION (HYATT TERRACES BAGUIO), Petitioners, vs. Home > ChanRobles Virtual Law Library > Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |